Friday, December 23, 2005

The "Dear Stranger" Song


Watch the video
Those who have followed this blog will know I shot a music video recently for The Tourist a.k.a Hunter McDermott. During one of the downtimes we had, Hunter serenaded us with some songs. To say the least, it was quite moving. It is easy to forget how beautiful it is to have someone sing or perform for you at home. Anyways, after the shoot, Hunter emailed me a rough draft of a song that is based on Dear Stranger. I was flattered. It is quite beautiful.

Wednesday, April 13, 2005

Bottle Rocket

The Motel Adventure
Wes Anderson (1996)


It would seem that my buddy Nathan and I have watched Bottle Rocket too many times. When he traveled to a different part of the world, our subject line for our emails would contain lines from the film.

When I told him, it was time for him to visit, it read "Anthony, when are you coming home?"
He responded with "I can't come home Grace, I'm an adult now." (By the way my name is not Grace)
And when he could come, it read "Mr. H, we are coming home."
When we lost touch with a common friend "He flew the coup."
When he started something new, my response was "I have never known you to be all that athletic."

Now to many of you who have not watched this film, all this must sound like a complete nonsense. But if you have watched this film more than once maybe not as many times as me, these lines might start a giggle or two. No Shakespearean grandness of meaning or importance. Like its title, there is a childlike lightness in Bottle Rocket, an element you can find in all of Wes Anderson's films. The characters are stuck in some childhood past, unable to grow up and even when they consciously try to become or think like adults, their solutions and actions are childlike. Take for example, Dignan's (Owen Wilson) notes or plans for him and Anthony (Luke Wilson) for the next 25 years-
BR-2a
Anderson's other (wonderful) films seem to be variations on Bottle Rocket. Like his characters, Wes Anderson seems to have also refused change.
BR-3
There is many reasons why I love this film, one of the sillier ones is my fetishism for motels. Not the run down, beat up ones with a pimp and a prostitute around every corner but the flat sprawling ones in the middle of nowheres. I just love the flatness, cement floors, the communal archietecture, walking barefoot to get ice or the pool that is been barely touched. People, lives, drama hiding behind closed doors. Everyone including yourself with a different but mysterious reason to be in this transitionary place. Anthony, Dignan and Bob find themselves at the motel because they are on the run from "Johnny Law" as they have just robbed a bookstore. Expecting a bigger high, Anthony and Bob are disappointed as they quickly find themselves bored. Dignan, the self-appointed leader, decides to show them that "crime does pay" by booking a room in the motel. However, the piddly booty can only afford a small cramped room.
BR 1
The murky pool is no better.
BR-4
Emerging from the water, Anthony is disappointed. But a sweet, foreign tune starts to call his attention.
posted by Ajit Anthony Prem at Wednesday, April 13, 2005 0 comments

Monday, January 31, 2005

raging bull

Prison Scene
dir: martin scorsese (1980)

There was a beautiful period in college, it was right after I had pulled my hamstring at a college track event and was sidelined. No, I do not enjoy pain. But it was the feeling of being sidelined, the complete loss of accountability to the usual stock of authority, no more practices, no more coaches, no more demands. After class, I had a half hour of rehabilitation for my injury and then I was free. Well, not every day (worked at a movie theater at nights), just tuesdays which is all I ever needed. Because every tuesday, the Symphony Space theater (uptown-New York City) used to play classic double bills. I cannot remember the pairings but I remember the movies, Avventura, Aguirre -The Wrath of God, 8 1/2, The Magnificent Ambersons, The Searchers, Virdiana, Pickpocket, La Dolce Vita, Singing in the Rain and such classics. And during the rest of the week, I would catch the Satyajit Ray retrospective at the Lincoln Center theater after work. Those were really some great times. Back to Symphony Space, I do not remember which played first or second but I remember the pairing that made one of the best nights of cinema for me. The double billing was Bicycle thief and Raging Bull, it is incredible to even think back on it now because each movie would have brought in a sizable audience on its own.

Raging Bull is a highly acclaimed movie. Some say the finest of the finest director out there, Martin Scorsese. A director I have a very close affinity with. In my lonely male period, his films linger prominently. From the single mom and child scenario in Alice doesn't live here anymore to the traveling squatter character in Taxi Driver to the borrowed families of Goodfellas, his films resound with relevance. Raging Bull was more of the same, inability to really connect because of a fundamental arrogance of one's own nature. Arrogance.

Jake LaMotta is arrogant, in his boxing ability and his own moral superiority. During most of the film, you are subjected to his arrogance. I bet many viewers have not been able to reach the end out of pure emotional suffocation. I know it is especially hard on women with the domestic abuse that runs prominently in the plot. A modern Macbeth, you wait for his punishment to be administered by the cosmic cycles of this world. "Give us what we want Mr. Skorzezee, have some big dude or a bunch of big dudes beat the crap out of him like they do in all the other films. Have a beautiful girl break his heart. Have his best friend or brother double cross him." In a sense all these things happen, his brother leaves him, his wife and his kids leave him, he gets beaten to pulp by Sugar Ray, he is broke. And yet there is no satisfaction, no catharsis- the purging of emotional tensions. Many directors think it is cheap to do such a thing and sometimes they are right.
RB-one
Thrown into prison, Jake fights all the way into the cell. Once inside, his fight turns inward. He goes to the wall, places his hands on it and pauses. And then slowly like it were a drumbeat, he starts to pound the wall with his head. What a gruesome sound! Faster and faster. His head, his hands, his head again, his hands, his elbow. Till he has no other body part left to inflict injury on.
rb-two
"Why, why, why, why" louder and louder his angry voice gets.

With each why asking a different but same root question. Why am I am this way? Why cannot I change? Why cannot I be somebody else? Why can't I help myself? Why am I a beast?

His cries childlike in its helplessness and the frustration.

He sits down, his face hiding in the darkness, just his arms and shoulders show.

"Why am I so stupid?" he says in the shadows. "I am not an animal."
rb-three
It is hard not to choke up. He looks absolutely lonesome in the shadows, so irrelevant. He, finally, achieves humility. Just another human being, with his set of problems, struggling with themselves. From here on you, Jake LaMotta becomes a pathetic figure. Watching the rest of the film, a cleansed tiredness overcomes me like taking a warm shower before going to bed. Jake LaMotta never gets to make everything right again. Like reality, his only reward is knowing, to understand, to do better next time even if there is no next time.

The Scorsese and DeNiro collaboration have brought some great scenes to cinema. But the stand out's are ones created as an afterthought. The iconic "are you talking to me?" scene in Taxi Driver was an improv and I would guess the same for this scene. The writing credit for Raging Bull goes to Paul Schrader who in his own right, an incredible talent. Scorsese prefers to improv much of the dialog, and it is the same with this film as he and DeNiro (has been said) rewrote the original script and then rewrote some more on set. Good improv on film feels like powerful theater, the demarkation between the actor and the character are not so clear, each flirts with the other, guiding the other along. This film would probably not lose its stature if this scene were never made or included. With the virtuoso performance by DeNiro and almost perfect direction by Scorsese, it was destined to obligatory prominence. But this beating of oneself gives the film a heart.

In all of Scorsese films, there is wonderful loneliness that comforts me. A deep sense of connection to the world and to myself like this is the way it should always be. To be an urban monk, questioning and prodding oneself to find a truer self, a better self. Reflecting back, I do not know how much of that is true but that sort of life is a lot simpler theoretically. If had someone had asked me to explain the world, I would have at least tried, however naive or arrogant I might have sounded. Now, I would not know where to begin.

Saturday, January 22, 2005

george washington

Opening Scene
dir: david gordon green (2000)

Before I moved out of New York City to be with my lady, my visions of rural America (if that still exists) came from limited bus travels through the states and also, more significantly, the images from cinema. And with cinema, I do not mean "Fried Green Tomatoes" or any other Hollywood flick that fulfilled most actor's wet dream of applying a Southern accent to their otherwise perfect speech. "George Washington" struck me immediately. I thought I understood the south through this film. I imagined those characters walking around having strange conversations with each other. Strange rustic places where one does some serious daydreaming. A childhood utopia. Giant mysterious machines, railroads that promised exotic travels, backwoods that kept nature playful. People seemed true, they had a passiveness about them. No shoes to fit, no roles to play, no one trying to be important or somebody else. Weeds and life took a toll on their faces and souls. They had been affected.

The film was shot in North Carolina, I was intrigued. I even entertained the idea of moving there and shooting a film. I visited my friend, who lived in NC, to check it out. I was disappointed. All I saw was shopping centers, good restaurants, cars, fancy roads. I was promised that in some adjacent towns there lived such a world. But I didn't believe them.
GW-top
A couple of years later, I met my LOML and lo' and behold, she was from North Carolina. After an unbearable year of a long distance relationship, I decided to move here. I do love the place but not for all the reasons I had previously. Some of it, especially the people, are true. But the mood, the daydreams I rarely see.

Recently, we drove into Goldsboro by mistake and I saw train tracks and factories that reminded me of George Washington. They were beautiful. But it looked like it was waiting to disappear. I bet someone rides by it everyday and wishes it were gone.
GW-middle
Many directors are said to have this special gift of understanding childhood. They don't. I believe most of them understand fear really well but not the wonderful, almost spiritual, childhood curiosity about the world. David Gordon Green captures a curiosity that is not expressed as a shock with a gaping mouth but instead through travels in one own's head to see the confusion, the possibilities, the answers that come with growing up.

The opening scene is a meditative daydream. What peaks the curiosity of these children are not other worldly. Instead it is the common place, what has been thrown to the floor and discarded. It is quite a simple build up, beautiful shot after beautiful shot with some beautiful revelations. You could do something similar with your home video camera. But what always gets me is when all of a sudden the voice stops and the camera zooms ever so slowly into this beautiful rustic metal panel of a moving railroad car. Stop, look at this, it is nothing and all the same beautiful. Or even more beautiful than the considered beautiful.
GW-bottom

Friday, January 21, 2005

a new beginning

I guess i have joined a generation of bloggers. Hope I am not too late to the party.

A filmmaker I will always be. But there are so many aspects of a filmmaker than just creating one. My blogger goal would be to talk about film not as reviews or as studies but instead as an innocent subjective moments that other films (or even mine) affect me. I will leave the scholars to disect films for themes and all that good stuff. I want to talk about the moments that move me, that live in my thoughts, and beg to be spoken about.

Next to me and hopefully not the only person who will be reading this is the LOML (love of my life).